国务院办公厅印发《意见》 促进全域旅游发展

Comments

百度 显然就从这个得分上我们就能够看的出来如今广东在进攻端的改变有多强大，同时在防守端在斯隆加盟之后广东的外线防守真可谓是固若金汤尤其在限制外援这一点斯隆更是无可挑剔，要知道在过去的两场比赛上亚当斯分别只有19投4中和26投8中的尴尬数据，毫无疑问，斯隆就是最适合广东男篮的小外援，同时斯隆也是最适合易建联的小外援，在这种情况下广东何愁不能报上年被新疆横扫之愁，又何愁不能夺取队史上第就座总冠军奖杯？相信大家一定还记得在常规赛结束的时候广东男篮首轮的对手是新疆男篮，在当时几乎有80%的球迷一直认为新疆会横扫广东晋级下一轮，即便不能横扫也一定可以轻松打进下一轮。

Why use Hong Kong, China instead of Hong Kong? :O --Yacht 09:14, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)

That's their official name in the organization, because the PRC wants to emphasize that HK is part of China. That's how theyre listed on the apec website. --Jiang 13:18, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Oh, i c. but that sounds redundant anyway... ;) --Yacht 13:43, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)

Yacht, many places in the world are happy to have the name of their country abbreviated in some way, but this does not seem to be true of anything "China". For instance, I live in Australia, and I am happy for it to be known that way. Technically it is the "Commonwealth of Australia", and that is how it appears on all official documents. I would even suggest that in the official namelist of APEC it is "Commonwealth of Australia", even if it doesn't say so on their web page. Recently I changed "Brunei Darussalem" to just "Brunei" to save some space, and Jiang reverted my change. I think he is basing his mods on this page.

Jiang, in english we capitalize acronyms, so that would be "the APEC website", not "the apec website". - Gaz 14:36, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

In internet forums, we sometimes often capitalization out of laziness. Please understand that.

As I explained elsewhere, the official name used is relevant and important. Part of the agreement in 1991 to allow the Chinese into apec was to have one China be known as the "People's Republic of China" and the other as "Chinese Taipei". The latter would not be a member now if it had insisted on using "Taiwan" or "Republic of China". Beijing would also love to be known as simply "China" since it claims sole legitimacy to the title. Adding the "Darussalem" after Brunei is just for consistency since we need to use official designations for the Chinas. --Jiang 22:13, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)

The boxes at the bottom of country-pages seem to be getting out of hand (for example on United States. The geographical boxes made sense as a navigational aid, but boxes for every major treaty organization seem to be rapidly leading to clutter. I mean, should most of the nations of the world receive a U.N. box at the bottom? Can anyone provide reasons why I shouldn't be bold and remove the APEC msg's? Shimmin 03:45, 8 May 2004 (UTC)

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Countries#Footers:_functionality,_aesthetics_and_standards. We should be removing them soon. I'm giving 1.5 weeks. --Jiang 04:55, 8 May 2004 (UTC)

Logo

I removed the logo - it's under fair use right now, which means it can only be used in the article namespace. See Wikipedia:Fair use. --Jtalledo (talk) 12:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Navbox consensus

There are plausible reasons for modifying a navbox templates which does not appear at the bottom of the page at Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). The template does appear at the bottom of the page for current leaders of each APEC member. An opportunity for discussion needs to be part of any process which precedes change.

A. The main navbox is very good: {{APEC}}—Template:Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation

B. Deleting the current leaders navbox?

This is a poor subject for a navbox because leaders change irregularly over time. The functional utility of this "leaders" navbox is not greater or better than the main navbox which shows member nations and serial summits.

• this would mean removing {{Current APEC Leaders}}—Template:Current APEC Leaders?

C. Perhaps decision-making may be helped by comparing an array of similar groups and templates?

• 21 in group> Template:APEC?
• Template:Current APEC Leaders?

• 18 in groupp> Template:G-15 nations?
• Template:Group of 15 Leaders?

• 8 in group> Template:D8 nations?

• 4 in group>Template:BRIC countries?
• Template:Current BRIC Leaders?
• Template:BRIC summits?

• 3 in group>Template:Trilateral meeting?
• 2 in group> Template:G-3?

• No navboxes yet> G77?G33?G24?G10?G5

• 20 in group> Template:G20?
• Template:Current G20 Leaders?
• Template:G-20 leaders' summits?

• 9 in group> Template:G8 nations?
• Template:Current G8 Leaders?
• Template:G8-Foreign?
• Template:G8-Finance?
• Template:G8-Defense?
• Template:G8-Justice?
• Template:G8-Interior?
• Template:G8 summits?

What is the best next step for this article? for similar articles? --Tenmei (talk) 00:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)