有才是什么意思| 至死不渝下一句是什么| 过敏吃什么药| 定海神针什么意思| 三级护理是什么意思| 经常扁桃体发炎是什么原因| 甲功不正常会得什么病| 不什么而同| 栩是什么意思| 庆幸是什么意思| 自己买什么药可以打胎| 混血是什么意思| 牙疼吃什么消炎药最好| 腰疼贴什么膏药| 犯罪心理学属于什么专业| 补铁有什么作用和功效| 痛风可以吃什么肉类和蔬菜| 10月4日什么星座| mk属于什么档次| 什么的点头| 女人更年期什么症状| 仲什么意思| 93年属什么今年多大| 临床医学是什么意思| 擦什么能阻止毛发生长| 漫展是什么| 自限性疾病是什么意思| 满月回娘家有什么讲究| 液氨是什么| 日行千里是什么生肖| 指甲花学名叫什么| 政五行属什么| leonardo是什么牌子| 手柄是什么意思| 命好的人都有什么特征| 年轻人手抖是什么原因| 压疮用什么药最快能好| 哈喇味是什么味道| 为什么吐后反而舒服了| 什么除草剂三年不长草| 400能上什么大学| 鼻涕臭是什么原因| 尿蛋白弱阳性是什么意思| 风格是什么意思| 戒烟后为什么会发胖| 荨麻疹能吃什么水果| 825是什么意思| 吃芒果有什么坏处| 天什么地| 什么叫强迫症| 高温天气喝什么水最好| 什么叫基因突变| 冷藏和冷冻有什么区别| 背上长痘痘是什么原因| 梦见买狗是什么意思| 怀孕会有什么反应| 送男生什么礼物| uva是什么意思| 全血粘度低切偏高是什么意思| 右耳朵疼是什么原因| 农历五月二十是什么星座| 猫什么时候传入中国| 宫外孕是什么原因造成的| 舌尖发麻是什么病的前兆| 起湿疹是什么原因造成的| cnb是什么意思| 脾虚吃什么水果| 尼特族是什么意思| 烟火气息是什么意思| 什么人| 为什么男人喜欢女人的胸| 女人颧骨高有什么说法| 黄五行属性是什么| 独在异乡为异客是什么节日| 王者风范是什么意思| 脑干堵塞什么症状| 嘢是什么意思| 肤色黑穿什么颜色| 民营和私营有什么区别| 梦见小白蛇是什么预兆| 螳螂捕蝉黄雀在后是什么生肖| 阴道排气是什么原因| 横空出世是什么意思| 水能变成什么| 小康生活的标准是什么| 821是什么星座| 胡萝卜含有什么维生素| ab型血可以给什么血型输血| 7.23什么星座| 买车置换是什么意思| 嗜睡是什么病| 市政府秘书长什么级别| 三焦指的是什么| 尿里面有血是什么原因| 望闻问切什么意思| 人生格言是什么| 左下腹疼痛挂什么科| 原生家庭是什么| exo是什么意思| 面包虫长大后变成什么| 瑞舒伐他汀什么时候吃最好| 梦到很多蛇是什么意思| 胃疼吃什么食物最养胃| 阴道口发白是什么原因| penguins是什么意思| 意象是什么意思| 豆粕是什么东西| 薄荷脑是什么东西| 出大汗是什么原因| 肤色暗黄适合穿什么颜色的衣服| 东施效颦的意思是什么| 回民不能吃什么| 湿气重喝什么| 中国最长的河流是什么河| 再生纤维素纤维是什么| 助产专业是干什么的| 驼背挂什么科| 阑尾粪石是什么意思| abo是什么血型| 喝水都会胖是什么原因| 六亲缘浅是什么意思| 五花肉炒什么好吃| 荷花代表什么象征意义| 陶渊明是什么朝代| 腿上起水泡是什么原因| 风湿是什么原因造成的| 去三亚需要什么证件| 蝉是什么| 尽收眼底是什么意思| 慢性疾病都包括什么病| 拔牙后需要注意什么| 宫后积液是什么意思| 六月份生日是什么星座| 不明原因发烧挂什么科| 口干舌燥吃什么药最好| bbc是什么意思| 操姓氏读什么| 2025年是什么命| 落拓是什么意思| 亟须什么意思| 头晕吃什么食物好| 什么叫基因检测| 女性睾酮高意味着什么| 甲胎蛋白什么意思| 手心脱皮是什么原因| 牙齿根部发黑是什么原因| 甲状腺减退什么症状| 最贵的榴莲是什么品种| 支原体感染吃什么药好| 频繁小便是什么原因| 梦见老公怀孕什么预兆| 坐飞机什么东西不能带| 三合是什么意思| 游丝是什么意思| 摇摇欲坠是什么意思| 印度为什么那么热| 老打瞌睡犯困是什么原因| 木薯是什么东西图片| 痛经什么感觉| 心肌缺血吃什么食物| 豺是什么动物| 梦见织毛衣是什么意思| semir是什么牌子| 吃饭肚子疼是什么原因| 大便一粒粒的是什么原因| 泉中水命是什么意思| 书香是什么意思| 猫最喜欢吃什么| 17年属什么生肖| 柠檬酸是什么| 落日余晖什么意思| csf是什么意思| 味淋是什么东西| 9.23什么星座| 七月18日是什么星座| 扁桃体发炎吃什么水果| 贴切的意思是什么| 什么叫孝顺| 怕吹空调是什么原因| 生肖蛇和什么生肖相冲| 吃虾不能吃什么水果| 风湿属于什么科| 亚麻籽油是什么植物的籽榨出来的| 一垒二垒三垒全垒打是什么意思| 神经官能症是什么症状| 不宁腿是什么症状| 沙茶是什么| 鼻基底用什么填充最好| 贫血吃什么维生素| 肝占位是什么意思| 无事不登三宝殿什么意思| 88年属什么的| 政字五行属什么| 月经要来之前有什么症状| 结肠炎吃什么药最见效| 子宫筛查主要检查什么| 降钙素原是什么意思| 精不液化是什么原因导致的| 属鸡和什么属相相克| 什么是白条| 子宫内膜厚是什么原因造成的| 97属什么| 一千年前是什么朝代| 相见不如怀念是什么意思| 什么快递便宜| 双的反义词是什么| 鸭子什么时候下蛋| 陈晓和赵丽颖为什么分手| rh阴性血是什么血型| 风水宝地是什么意思| 一个米一个更念什么| 右手大拇指抖动是什么原因| 口子念什么| 上海市长是什么级别| 类风湿和风湿有什么区别| 为什么会得丹毒| 号是什么| 神仙水是什么| 阑尾炎吃什么食物好| 威海是什么海| 口干口臭口苦吃什么药| 嗓子总有痰吃什么药| 肺肿了是什么病严重吗| 猫咪掉胡子是什么原因| 什么时候受孕率最高| 肠息肉是什么| 黑枸杞有什么功效| 10月3号是什么星座| 农历八月是什么月| 贲门不舒服有什么症状| 形同陌路是什么意思| 什么大什么小| 名称是什么意思| 办理生育登记有什么用| 什么的嘴| poem是什么意思| gmail是什么邮箱| 荣辱与共是什么意思| 龙眼是什么季节的水果| qjqj什么烟| 胆囊壁不光滑是什么意思| 胡歌真名叫什么| 心率偏低是什么原因| 血糖高吃什么可以降下来| 手指脱皮是什么原因| 熬夜吃什么对身体好| 傻人有傻福什么意思| 什么是风热感冒| 宝宝乳糖不耐受喝什么奶粉比较好| 杏仁和什么不能一起吃| 张一山和杨紫是什么关系| 7.13什么星座| 梦见借给别人钱是什么意思| 什么是尿毒症| 做免疫组化意味什么| 岔气了吃什么药| 熬夜 吃什么| 外阴苔癣是一种什么病| 隔离霜是干什么用的| 肝胆相照是什么生肖| 泰国的钱叫什么| 待我长发及腰时下一句是什么| 多梦是什么原因| 刚怀孕吃什么最好最营养| 百度Jump to content

两会连连看之热词图解:大国外交(图)-画说时政-时政频道-中工网

Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
百度 直属机关党委在中央国家机关工委领导和总会党组指导下开展工作。

    Requests for permissions

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 14:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
    • Temporary account IP viewer (add request · view requests): IP masking is coming to the English Wikipedia in September 2025. To prepare for this, non-admins may request access to view temporary account data.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

    Administrators

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator


    Autopatrolled

    Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Came here to request this permission for a different user, but since Yoblyblob is referencing their WP:MAY25 NPP work, it is worth noting that among the re-reviews of each patroller's work, 14/17 of their patrol decisions were approved. Of the remainder, two were drafted/redirected as WP:TOOSOON coverage of 2026 state elections and one was drafted for lacking enough coverage to qualify under WP:NEVENT. Considering they were the fifth most active patroller of the drive, this accuracy is good, not great. ViridianPenguin?? (??) 19:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 ???? (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The sourcing provided here does not appear to meet WP:NORG, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Can you provide sources that establish the notability of this organization? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree some of the sourcing used is WP:CORPTRIV — the foundation has extensive coverage in Korea. I've just added some stronger pieces. The pre/post interview text in this Forbes feature is one with significant secondary coverage. CherryPie94 ???? (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Been an active user for a few years, created 25+ articles with the only two deletions being mistakenly created redirects (due to a script error). Multiple GAs and FLs. I understand enwiki notability guidelines thoroughly.ULPS (talk ? contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Support! Low article creation activity in the trailing year, but I'm somewhat familiar with ULPS's work, and would consider him trustworthy enough for autopatrolled. Spot-checks for copyright concerns and sourcing turn up no issues. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello @ULPS. Where did you cite the DOB for Pat Flynn (musician). No other problems in your most recent creations I could spot. Unrelated, your signature is too light to meet WP:SIGAPP; could you chose a darker colour to get enough contrast. I note that it looks more bold in Chrome than in Firefox. —Femke ?? (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey @Femke, I think I forgot to cite it. I used an Instagram post of his, which I think is fine under ABOUTSELF, and went and added it now. Apologies, I usually don't forget things like that. And thanks for the heads up about my sig, I'll change it asap. ULPS (talk ? contribs) 22:38, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done —Femke ?? (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a variety of subjects. The articles are fairly well-written and -formatted; a few are also now GAs. I marked a couple of her newer creations as reviewed and found no major issues. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have created over 650 new articles and hope to continue contributing to Wikipedia and knowledge sharing. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: I checked three of TinaLees-Jones's recently-created articles at random. One had not yet been reviewed, so I reviewed it and found a significant issue with source-text integrity. I recommend waiting for her reply here before this request is actioned.
    Separately, some of her articles have been nominated for deletion; it's hard to tell exactly how many, since her user talk page is archived by a bot, but the archives are not linked. One was recently deleted and one ended in no consensus. (I believe I have !voted in AfDs on her articles, presumably mostly to keep, but I can't tell because of the weird archiving.) I do think the vast majority of articles she creates are unquestionably notable, mostly on variations of NPOL, but as some have been questioned recently I'm not sure if granting AP now is appropriate. Toadspike [Talk] 13:35, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello,

    I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia.

    In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support.

    Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.

    Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

    Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello,

    I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing.

    I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles.

    I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role.

    I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing.

    Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi @Sweetabena: I’ve gone through some of the articles you’ve created, including Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy. I noticed that these pages have been tagged for AI-generated content (WP:LLM). Could you please clarify this? Additionally, the article on Bright Owusu has a notability issue. Have you made any efforts to address or fix that? I also noticed that most of your articles are about politicians or MPs, which is generally a relatively easier area for a New Page Patroller. Regards! Baqi:) (talk) 12:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Jannatulbaqi,
    Thanks for your response and for reviewing my request.
    I've now gone through the articles you mentioned; Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style.
    Regarding Bright Owusu, I realized that the subject is better known publicly as “C-Confion,” which is the name used in most reliable sources. I initially created a redirect page under that name, and since C-Confion better reflects WP:COMMONNAME, I’ve submitted a technical move request at WP:RM/TR to move the article accordingly.
    While many of my articles are in the political space, I’ve focused on that area because it's typically easier to demonstrate notability. That said, I’m open to expanding into other areas and continuing to improve the range and quality of my contributions.
    I appreciate your time and consideration, and I remain committed to constructive, policy-compliant editing. Thank you so much.Sweetabena (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap ?? 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Cognifex (requesting Autopatrolled) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right. I have been an active contributor for over a month, with more than 1,700 edits across diverse topics, particularly in Indian biographies, cinema, history, and culture. I consistently adhere to Wikipedia's content policies, including notability, verifiability, and neutral point of view. Several of my articles have been successfully accepted through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the workload on new page reviewers by allowing trusted users like myself to create articles without requiring manual review. Thank you for your time and consideration.
     Automated comment This user has created roughly 7 articles. MusikBot talk 10:10, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done, Cognifex. Autopatrolled requires you to have made at least 25 articles. With 7 articles, unfortunatetly, you're still quite a way of from meeting the criteria. Please take the feedback from AfC reviewers on board, and avoid using AI to write articles. They often fabricate information, which is not what Wikipedia is for. But keep up the good work! —Femke ?? (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Had my first AP request declined due to my poor judgement with notability of railway stations. I've learned from that mistake (and cleaned up after myself), and I've created articles like Expo 2025 pavilions (Although this was a collaboration with Epicgenius) and Magical Girl Witch Trials since my request was declined. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Link to their first request. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for over two years, and I truly feel that it is one of my greatest passions in life. I have made more than 4,000 edits and am credited with creating over 100 articles, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. Additionally, I have expanded and improved numerous stub articles, enhancing their content and quality. I have also translated several articles into local languages, making Wikipedia more accessible to a broader audience. By becoming autopatrolled, I believe I can not only continue contributing effectively to the Wikipedia community based on my vast knowledge of WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing but also help ease the burden on administrators in assessing quality content. That's why I'm requesting this permission. I'm happy to answer any questions or improve any articles I've created if there's anything noticeable that needs attention. Royalesignature (talk). 11:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) While echoing Rosguill's concerns here, I think your creations would make good use of another eye, and taking a look at your recent creations: Kwara State Ministry of Health (yesterday's creation) was created and three out of the five references are primary sources (two being directly Kwara State affiliated, and the other to the Google Scholar profile of the Commissioner), with an empty "External links" section; Osun State College of Health Technology, Ilesa (yesterday's creation) has citations to the subject's own website "osunhealthtechilesa.edu.ng" and also cites MySchoolGist which describes itself as "a registered publisher and marketing solutions provider in Nigeria" (emphasis mine). Whoops, I also noticed that 35% of the content of the article is flagged as copied from osunhealthtechilesa.edu.ng, while it appears to be flagging mostly proper nouns, the entire text of the "Courses" section was copied from there, and the text content of that section is not very appropriate for a section called "Courses"; School of this and School of that is more of the name of the Faculty/College than the name of the "course".
    While I'd agree with you that Adetunji Abidemi Olusoji is notable per the notability guidelines for politicians, all the sources you used do not reflect that you have a clear understanding of reliable sources.
    Tope Olarinoye Olayonu (from four days ago) has a date of birth but I couldn't verify this date from any of the sources you cited, even though I shouldn't rely on them in the first place.
    Nazmat Surajudeen Bakinde (from one month ago) has citations to kwarastate.gov.ng, unilorin.edu.ng, ENetSuD.org, and Google Scholar, some being unreliable while others being primary sources. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done. Royalesignature, thanks for working on an underdeveloped part of Wikipedia! Unfortunately, any recent issues around copyright preclude me from giving you autopatrolled. For your information, it's not admins but new page patrollers that this would ease the burden of. Do take on the feedback from vanderwaalforces around reliable sourcing. WP:Wikiproject Nigeria might be able to help you further find higher-quality sourcing! —Femke ?? (talk) 15:55, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Umarxon III (requesting Autopatrolled) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify) Hello. I would like to get an automatic patrol permission. Sincerely, Umarxon III (talk) 21:58, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done sorry, I don't think you have enough varied experience of article creation at this time. -- asilvering (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello! I've created a large number of My Little Pony and mathematics articles. I have over 6,700 edits and will continue to edit for as long as I can. I'm requesting autopatrol permissions so that the NPP backlog will be less cluttered with my articles. I believe I've demonstrated a solid understanding of the policies and guidelines with my articles, particularly with my coverage of various aspects of the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fandom. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 17:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Toadboy123 has created 193 articles of consistently high quality; none have been deleted, while quite a few have gone through DYK and appeared on the Main Page, often with excellent hooks. I do not think we need to keep reviewing their creations.

    Toadboy123 was warned twice for copyright violations by Diannaa in 2022, but she and I have both taken a look at several articles created since then and haven't found further issues (discussed here, after which I spot checked six recent creations). Additionally, DYK checks each nomination for copyright violations. Thus, I believe they have taken that feedback to heart. Toadspike [Talk] 12:52, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    While not what I would call "prolific", I do regularly create articles, and intend to continue, so the addition of this right would help the project a little. None of the articles I have created (over 100) have been rejected, so hopefully I am a safe bet! Tony Holkham (Talk) 21:57, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done asilvering (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, I have started over two dozen meticulously crafted articles, which are free of issues. Most of these are Japan or Shinto-related. There was one draftified article from a while ago, which I quickly learned from and have since created only notable topics with sufficient sources. I'm familiar with Wikipedia's core policies and copyvio guidelines. Yenistardom (talk) 06:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have created more than 25 articles, over several years. I learnt over time to understand the notability criteria well. My new pages do not require attention from patrollers. Only one page I created is marked as deleted (it was recreated under a slightly different name). I have overall over 1000 edits. Thank you for the consideration. Queenofboston (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Queenofboston: Thank you for your contributions. Spot-checking one of your creations at random, Michelle Meagher, indicated direct copying from a source (report) and non-neutral prose ("Meagher was confronted with a crisis of consciousness", also closely paraphrased from the source). I'll leave a message on your talk page with more information about copyright considerations on Wikipedia, and I would recommend reading about the encyclopedic tone that should be used in articles. For these reasons, I don't think autopatrolled would be appropriate for you at the moment. Please let me know if you have any questions. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @TechnoSquirrel69 the source you singled out for copyright issues was published in 2024. The Michelle Meagher Wikipedia entry was created by me in 2023 with the contested phrase in it. So the source that was added later copied the Wikipedia page not the other way round, I did not copy the text from that source as it did not exist at the time of the page creation. Queenofboston (talk) 18:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser


    I would like to do cleanups after requested moves, in particular fixing links to go to the main article instead of a redirect. Dantus21 (talk) 01:20, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    This smells like a violation of point 4 of WP:AWBRULES. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I disagree, but feel free to deny my request, or if you want I can retract it. Dantus21 (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It does seem reasonable to use AWB for this purpose (changing mistargeted wikilinks does not seem fun to do by hand, especially if it comes into the hundreds), albeit it might be a good time to see if there's consensus for this type of usage if there hasn't been any relevant discussions. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:02, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure what I was thinking here. Though I do think that it is helpful for WP:PTOPIC changes and the WP:POSTMOVE after that, but not for every move. Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You may want to have a look at the Move+ script which can automate link retargeting. CoconutOctopus talk 10:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If the redirect is still targeted at the moved article (as I, and apparently Pppery but not Tenshi, interpret this request) then this would violate WP:NOTBROKEN. @Dantus21: Do you have an example of a requested move that you would use this to clean up? ~ Jenson (SilverLocust ??) 03:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    To be honest I'd rather have someone just deny this request now and I'll request it later if I need it for something else. Dantus21 (talk) 02:39, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Confirmed


    Event coordinator


    Extended confirmed


    File mover


    Mass message sender

    Just proposed a large WikiProject merge here, and intend to propose more in the future of similar scale. I would rather prefer avoiding the trouble of sending individual notifications (in this case to 55 WikiProject talk pages) and don't want to be a bother constantly spamming the talk page with requests. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]



    New page reviewer

    My trial NPP right expires on August 8, and I would like for it to be extended or made permanent. Thanks. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 00:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 8 August 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 00:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 13:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    My XfD performance stands at 93%[2] and my total edit count is above 5,000. I believe I can contribute towards reducing the backlog. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 10:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, trial track record looks good signed, Rosguill talk 14:26, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Looking to help more directly with the rather intimidating backlog in the NPP. Have created dozens of articles at this point—already under the guise of auto-patrolled permissions for three years now—I feel confident in my article evaluation abilities. In particular, I'm deeply familiar with WP:GNG and related notability requirements on WP, with a special emphasis on WP:BLP, having delved into BLP biographies on my own through my efforts to improve site-wide coverage on music critics and musicologists. – Aza24 (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, thank you for volunteering signed, Rosguill talk 15:29, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have been editing for over five years with 3.8K mainspace edits, which includes 61 articles creations, none of which have been deleted. I have never had a behavioral block or 3RR violation. In the May 2025 backlog drive, three of my 83 patrols were re-reviewed by JTtheOG and all were approved. I have been granted three-month NPP trials in May 2024, Feb 2025, and April 2025, so I hope that I can be trusted with this permission on a non-trial basis. ViridianPenguin?? (??) 04:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, track record looks good. signed, Rosguill talk 15:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I would like to renew my patroller (New Page Reviewer) user right, which is set to expire on 10 August 2025. I have remained active in reviewing new pages, tagging problematic content, and contributing to the overall quality control process. I understand the policies surrounding page curation and continue to apply them carefully. I’d appreciate the opportunity to continue serving in this capacity.

    Thank you for your consideration. Icem4k (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 10 August 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 15:47, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Icem4k, could you comment on your evaluation of the case for notability of Tyler Toney? signed, Rosguill talk 15:22, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh @Rosguill, I wasnt expecting that question but here’s my comment on Tyler Toney’s notability well... Uhmm Primarily, he is the co-founder and central on-screen member of the sports and comedy group Dude Perfect, one of the most popular and influential YouTube collectives globally. I believe that his foundational role in creating and leading Dude Perfet constitutes a major contribution to the evolution of online sports entertanment. Given his consitent presence and prominence within the group, and the fact that there is significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources, I believe he meets the General Notability Guideline (GNG). Icem4k (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Creatives notable for work with exactly one group are typically not given separate articles, but instead are covered in that article. So unless coverage for Tyler Toney exclusively outside the context of Dude Perfect meets WP:GNG, we would merge/redirect his biography to Dude Perfect. Looking at the article, essentially all the coverage is in the context of Dude Perfect, so I’m not seeing the case for a stand-alone article. signed, Rosguill talk 16:17, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Page mover

    Mainly requesting so I can bold move pages to multi-revision redirects, but I may cautiously move into closing RMs one day. I think I have decent experience from participating at WP:RMC and understand the guidelines reasonably well. Thanks, Kowal2701 (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Some recent examples where I had to start an RM where I would have bold moved are Talk:Caliphate of Hamdullahi#Requested move 15 July 2025 and Talk:Amina, Queen of Zazzau#Requested move 24 July 2025 (ongoing) Kowal2701 (talk) 11:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Technically, if you would normally have bold moved a page (uncontroversial, do not expect opposition) but couldn't for technical reasons, WP:RM/TR would be the better way to do it since it avoids the 7 day listing period of a full RM. This is not a comment on the actual merits of granting or not granting though, which I'll leave to the patrolling admins. Alpha3031 (t ? c) 19:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If people don’t think I need the tool or that the benefit doesn’t outweigh the potential costs just say and I’ll retract this Kowal2701 (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Please be patient, you only asked a few days ago and perm requests are rarely handled same-day. Primefac (talk) 23:12, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Mb, I just saw one answered below and assumed it wasn’t a no-brainer Kowal2701 (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Apologies for wasting people’s time, I’ll retract this and follow Alpha3031’s advice re WP:RM/TR which I’d forgotten about Kowal2701 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done, but please note that I have not evaluated the request and am simply tagging this way because of OP's desire to retract it. -- asilvering (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, I recently began helping in clearing out requested moves at RMC. Usually, most of the requests would require me request at the technical request section as page already exist at moves desired location. With this right, I would be able to avoid this and move the pages directly. I have read the page mover page as well. Cactus?? spiky ouch 09:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for your help in closing moves. However, the recent number of RMNAC that have been performed where you've had to revert upon request recently, is concerning. While it is appreciated that you have been quick and willing to revert your closure, I think you need some more experience here with making the correct closure the first time. TiggerJay?(talk) 07:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done sorry Cactus, I agree with the above. -- asilvering (talk) 19:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I attempt whenever possible to correct article titles to sentence case when necessary, but am frequently unable to do so because of the existence of a single-edit redirect. I've been advised at "Requested moves" just to ask for the pagemover right already after 75,000 edits in nearly 11 years.

    A perfect current example: Sweet and Sour Pork, which I can't move to Sweet and sour pork without requesting the move and making someone else do my work for me.

    Thanks for your consideration! Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Note that Sweet and Sour Pork and Sweet and sour pork was actually unfortunately not a great example to make a case for page mover permissions - on review, you’ll find that there is a a long history at the latter as it was merged to Sweet and sour in 2013, as well as a whole mess as the former was (re-)created as a move from Gu Lao Rou, which in turn was only created in 2024 as a manual fork of Sweet and sour.
    So what we have here is now a pretty mess of “admin required” for histmerge as well as a few “{{copied from}}” on the relevant talk pages and review of the page edit histories to make sure attributions are placed as needed. I’ll copy this over to RM/TR, since I can’t action on the admin required histmerge review. (Edit): posted at RMTR. Raladic (talk) 07:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Pending changes reviewer

    I am a (relatively) long time contributor to Wikipedia, primarily active in content creation. However, following a recent and rather vexing experience involving a user introducing potentially harmful changes to articles en masse without any sort of satisfactory communication with other editors, I have decided I want to become active in dealing with vandalism as well. ? Saltymagnolia ? 15:36, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Saltymagnolia, pending changes reviewer is for approving edits on articles with pending changes protection -- it does not affect your ability to revert vandalism. I'm happy to grant the permission, but I just want to double check you're clear on what this will let you do? Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Giraffer as I understand, it applies to pages with a certain level of protection, where edits by newer or anonymous users require manual approval, e.g. on the article for Margaret Sanger. Thanks. ? Saltymagnolia ? 20:46, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Cool.  Done Giraffer (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have been editing for over a year and one of the pages that I recently requested protection is now at PC protection. I also have some experience with reverting vandalism, some via Special:RecentChanges. JuniperChill (talk) 20:38, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I would like to request reviewer rights and help flag vandalism across Wikipedia. I believe in Wikipedia’s core mission of neutrality, reliability, and free access to knowledge. I aim to contribute by reviewing pages for quality and sourcing, and to help maintain article integrity by countering vandalism. I have studied Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, notability, and civility, and am eager to support content moderation. Thank you for considering my request.

    Alephjamie (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Alephjamie (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]



    Rollback

    Hello, I'd like to get rollback rights to fight vandalism more effectively. While I don't patrol recent pages often, I do patrol new pages and short pages, where I frequently undo obvious vandalism (as seen in [3]). I'd like rollback to more easily undo edits, as well as access huggle and other tools. Yelps ???????? critique me 08:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I want to receive a rollback right because there are a lot of editors who add informations but not citing sources. Usually, they do not add unsourced informations at once, but they add them by multiple times. There are also edits violating MoS or Wikipedia policies. And I have struggled with reverting all of them one by one, so I decided to request a right for rollback. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 04:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Oops, my notification didn't notice that reply. I'm sorry for it. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 09:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I am requesting Rollback rights to help stop vandalism. I have made more than 2000 edits on Wikipedia since 2021. I understand how rollback works and will use it only when needed.

    Thank you Panda ?? Arun (Talk) 07:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I am a budding copyeditor with a growing number of watched pages to police for vandalism. Unfortunately, some vandals use multiple revisions, making it tedious and time-consuming to fix without a rollback permission. Thank you for your considerations. OceanLoop (talk) 13:19, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, can I request rollback rights to deal with vandalism? I will try to do whatever is necessary for the good of all. JohnDavies9612 (talk) 01:27, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm an active Recent Changes / anti-vandalism patroller, currently using UV & Twinkle (including Twinkle mobile), which have quasi-rollback. I've previously tried out RW but was not a fan of the interface personally, so I'm interested in trying out AV or Huggle as more efficient tools, both of which require rollback. Nil?? 05:08, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Template editor

    I would like to make a comparatively minor change to Template:TERYT as requested by Altenmann on the template's talk page. However, even though I created this template, it has had its protection level set. Kiwipete (talk) 04:04, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    It looks like that has gone unprocessed primarily because it was dequeued from having an active edit request. If this is one-off issue, I think the best solution would be to just put {{edit protected|answered=no}} back on the page, and a patrolling template editor should process it. (the backlog at Category:Wikipedia template-protected edit requests isn't usually very long). — xaosflux Talk 13:19, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done per the above (noting the TPER has been fulfilled). If this template needs future editing by you, Kiwipete, I believe it would be reasonable to simply drop its protection. Primefac (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Howdy. I'm an active participant over at WP:DYK, and recently ran in WP:AELECT but did not pass the threshold. Discussion centered around lack of experience on WP:AIV, an area I expressed interest in getting involved in. A decent part of my running for adminship was wanting to help with processing WP:DYK queues, which are template-protected. In my election discussion there were no concerns raised about my professionalism, content creation or reviewing competency, which are the primary things needed with processing DYK queues. I do not meet some of the standard template editor guidelines (e.g. sandbox/significant template edits, etc), but I also do not plan on using the role outside of DYK queue processing. Thanks for your consideration. ~Darth StabroTalk ? Contribs 16:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Are there any active DYKers that you are working with often that could leave support here? — xaosflux Talk 19:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary account IP viewer

    Looks like this is open for business now, so I figured now would be a good time to apply. I'm an NPPer and AfC reviewer and IP access is helpful for identifying disruption, catching socks, and in general just a helpful tool; so I'd like to maintain access when temp accounts roll out. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 21:43, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done CoconutOctopus talk 21:45, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Also a NPPer and AfC reviewer, who's additionally been doing some recent change patrolling (mostly with AntiVandal and RedWarn). IP access could be helpful especially for that last one, as we've been dealing with quite a few LTAs recently (if anyone is curious about my string of reverts without warnings, those are the thesaurus/date-changing LTA which was active these last few days). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:49, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done CoconutOctopus talk 21:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have been reverting and warning vandals for a while now. As evidence for that you can see I have created ~220 user talk pages and that I was granted the Rollback permission. Viewing IPs would be useful for my work here. Thank you. Sophocrat (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done CoconutOctopus talk 21:53, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hiya, another AfC/NPP reviewer here. I also do recent changes patrol occasionally, and TAIV can be helpful in all those areas for catching socks, LTAs, and just general disruption. GoldRomean (talk) 22:35, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 22:51, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done asilvering (talk) 22:51, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Cool so apparently if two admins press the button at precisely the same time, nothing happens. asilvering (talk) 22:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done, this time for real? asilvering (talk) 22:53, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok. Done for actual real now. The permissions granter script doesn't work for this yet. -- asilvering (talk) 22:55, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Lol! Sohom (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Haha, I get it three times now >:). Thanks, both! GoldRomean (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Frequent antivandal work with rollback, as well as NPP, would make this beneficial with the upcoming change. Haj (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I frequently do counter-vandalism and sockpuppetry investigations, both of which the ability to view IPs is very useful for (especially when tracking spam across network ranges!). I've been granted the rollback permission previously to assist with counter-vandalism. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 23:02, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 23:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm an AfC reviewer and a CopyPatroller, and semi-active in anti-vandalism. Being able to check temporary account IPs would be helpful in this area for identifying specific LTAs and identifying disruption over shifting ranges/different temporary accounts. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:04, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 23:07, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm active at NPP and in anti-vandalism, having the permission would be helpful once IP masking becomes a thing. ULPS (talk ? contribs) 23:27, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done HouseBlaster (talk ? he/they) 23:30, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I currently hold new page patroller and rollback rights and sometimes come across sock and LTA cases in the course of patrolling or otherwise editing. I think having the permission may be helpful once IP masking is implemented, since many of the socks and LTAs I come across use the same IP ranges. Epicgenius (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm an active Copypatroler and I'm semi active at anti-vandalism and AFC/NPP. Being able to see the IPs of the temporary accounts would be quite helpful. The4lines |||| (talk) 01:10, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done HouseBlaster (talk ? he/they) 01:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm semi-active at NPP and I do my fair share of anti-vandalism at times, so this would be useful for me. Perfect4th (talk) 02:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 02:04, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm a rollbacker and patroller and this right may help me when working on AfC, NPP, and anti-vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:09, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm active at Copypatrol and AfC, and semi-active at NPP. This right would be useful in that work for identifying disruption over different temporary accounts. MCE89 (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 02:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I spend most of my Wiki time doing anti-vandalism work as you can see in my contribs so I think this'd be useful when it comes online. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 03:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC) Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 03:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, I occasionally work on combating vandalism and sometimes patrol new pages. TAIV will be helpful in identifying vandal TA socks from LTAs and current IPs. Thanks! Ophyrius (he/him
    T ? C ? G
    ) 04:00, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    In addition to doing counter-vandalism, I develop user scripts for other editors, so I would like to be able to test their interaction with IP masking/reveal. Nardog (talk) 04:17, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm an active member at NPP, AfC, and vandalism control, having rollback as well. This will be very useful for requesting blocks and finding bad edits/drafts/articles by the same people but different accounts easily. Thanks in advance! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 04:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 04:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I currently hold the New Page Patroller (NPP), Rollbacker, and Pending Changes Reviewer (PCR) extendmover (Pagemover) rights. I am requesting access to Temporary Account IP Viewer rights to support ongoing efforts in countering vandalism, spam, and disruptive editing on Wikipedia and Having worked actively in patrolling new pages and reverting obvious vandalism, I have often encountered accounts engaging in disruptive behaviour, likely part of sockpuppetry networks. The Temporary Account IP Viewer tool would help me better identify patterns of abuse and act more effectively, in line with Wikipedia’s policies.--Warm Regards, Abhimanyu7  talk  04:51, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. —Femke ?? (talk) 06:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    This would be especially useful for countering vandalism and sockpuppets, which I often see and revert the edits of IPV6 ranges. Cards84664 06:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done – robertsky (talk) 07:31, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I've been active in recent changes patrolling, I've been granted rollback, and I often review at AfC which has led me to socks, so I believe I have a need for access as that would allow me to more easily detect and combat disruptive editing. I agree to the Foundation's policy regarding this permission. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:38, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Mz7 (talk) 10:32, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Admittedly I'm less active with RCP recently than I used to be, but I make semi-regular use of the IP information tool when patrolling, and it'd be handy to retain access to this when temporary accounts roll out. WindTempos they (talk ? contribs) 09:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Mz7 (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi. I am an AfC and NP reviewer and active in anti-vandalism. It would be useful in viewing temporary account IPs for identifying disruption and when IP masking is implemented. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 14:17, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done HouseBlaster (talk ? he/they) 14:28, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Just like many others, I might need to check IPs in the event I stumble upon socks whenever I do anti-vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 16:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done asilvering (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello! I'm fairly active in NPP and AfC, and I often perform anti-vandalism whenever I can. I'd like to request this right to make anti-vandalism easier. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 17:30, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done —Femke ?? (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm a frequent RC patroler as can be seen from my contributions. I have been also been granted rollback and PC reviewer. Not yet active at AfC or NPP as I would prefer some more experience. LightlySeared (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done HouseBlaster (talk ? he/they) 18:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm holding NPP, Rollbacker, PCR, and PM rights currently. I'm often involved in anti-vandalism works and occasionally countering sockpuppetry when encountered. It will be handy for my workflow when temporary accounts roll out. Thanks for your consideration. Paper9oll (?? ? ??) 18:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done —Femke ?? (talk) 18:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I often do recent changes patrol and have for several years. I also dip into NPP and SPI depending on my available time and happenstance. I currently hold rollbacker, new page reviewer, and pending changes reviewer. I agree to follow the Foundation's guidelines related to when to view and how to use IP addresses using this permission. Thanks! Skynxnex (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done —Femke ?? (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I sometimes patrol recent changes, though much less frequently than I used to and it's far from my main on-wiki activity these days. Based on past experience I believe that I would occasionally find this permission useful. I've read WP:TAIV and the Foundation guidelines, and agree to follow them and accept the concomitant risks and responsibilities. Wham2001 (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Mz7 (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello! I do a lot of antivandalism and a good amount of recent changes work, and this access would be very helpful for my continued patrolling. I will continue to only use IP address information in accordance with guidelines and policies. Thank you! tony 20:36, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done HouseBlaster (talk ? he/they) 20:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I will need TAIV for my anti-vandalism activities, NPP, and AfC, and I agree to solely use this right for those purposes. I meet all criteria for granting and already have NPP, PCR, and Rollback. Thank you for your consideration! ?Relativity ?? 20:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done voorts (talk/contributions) 20:46, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have access to the info-en queue in WP:VRT, and about 15-20% of the tickets are about having IPs blocked or along those lines. Not being able to see the IP would seriously hamper my ability to respond to these kind of tickets helpfully. I've already signed the access to nonpublic personal data policy for VRT as well. Thank you for considering, —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? - uselessc} 20:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done voorts (talk/contributions) 20:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, I confirm that I have read Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer and will conform to the the Foundation's guidelines. I have been editing Wikipedia for just short of 4 years. I mainly revert vandalism and unsourced content. I have had some involvement with SPI and LTA reporting. TAIV would be a helpful tool for this are. Many thanks. Knitsey (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done voorts (talk/contributions) 20:51, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Like others, I am active in patrolling recent changes for vandalism, this will be helpful in correlating edits. Celjski Grad (talk) 20:59, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 21:08, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I just saw the announcement of this change coming down the pipleline, as as someone who has worked in the areas of AIV, and more recently SPI work, and more specifically within the realms of COI/NPOV and contentious articles, access this would be helpful. Furthermore, I am identified to the foundation and previously had access to non-public information through tools such as ACC where I have previously been active several years ago. Cheers! TiggerJay?(talk) 21:06, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — rsjaffe ??? 21:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I am an occasional NPP reviewer and contribute to various sockpuppetry investigations (e.g., Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Unfriendnow and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MegGutman. JBL (talk) 21:36, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done – robertsky (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    As an active NPP user, this will be helpful. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done – robertsky (talk) 21:41, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I suspect I could use ths, as several of the pages on my watch list I take an interest in are subject to intermittent sock-bombing. Qwirkle (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done You do not have a recent history of reporting IP editors/socks. Your last report at AN/I doesn't give me confidence either. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:16, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I many work on referencing issues and source reliability, which sometimes intersects with vandalism, sockpuppets and LTAs. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ?@? °?t° 22:05, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — rsjaffe ??? 22:06, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Useful for NPP, SPI, and antivandalism/anti-spam. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done HouseBlaster (talk ? he/they) 23:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Will be useful to have when investigating vandalism, spam, and socks. I have reviewed wmf:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy and do confirm to use it only in accordance. Apparition11 Talk/Contribs 00:55, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 01:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey everyone, I'm an occasional Articles for creation reviewer, new pages patroller, and counter-vandalism-er. Working in those areas makes it possible that I'm investigating disruption from anonymous users, so I thought I'd request access preemptively. I've read the English Wikipedia procedural policy and WMF's policy about this right, and will follow them in good faith to the best of my ability. Please let me know if you have any questions! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:24, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done asilvering (talk) 01:25, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm not as active as I'd like to be, but still do work (drawer an occasional sock, clean up vandalism, etc) which would be impacted by not having access to IPs. JayCubby 02:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Could you post a few diffs showing your sock and or vandalism work? Thanks. — rsjaffe ??? 02:24, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rsjaffe, looks like the last time I filed a case at SPI was in (late) April. [5].
    Example countervandalism is this diff, from a week ago. here
    @HouseBlaster, it was a fairly standard loutsock a while back. Nothing I'm too proud of, but my psychiatrist thinks the underlying mental health issues have mostly been resolved. As for why there're five tickets, I can't say. JayCubby 02:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not going to accept or decline this request, but can you also comment on your own socking? (Admins, see UTRS:96920 and the five other UTRS appeals linked therein.) HouseBlaster (talk ? he/they) 02:32, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm active in anti-vandalism. Thanks. Frost 04:28, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Mz7 (talk) 04:29, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Long time CVU member to help protect Wikipedia against vandalism. AIV is like a second home, so I’d love to continue that and have the tools needed for the upcoming change. Have read the policy and agree to abide by it. Raladic (talk) 04:33, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Sohom (talk) 04:48, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I sometimes find vandalism/policy/guideline-violating edits by logged-out users on my watchlist and would like the ability to find out their underlying IP addresses for investigation purposes. I have read and agreed to the relevant Foundation policy. Graham87 (talk) 06:41, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — rsjaffe ??? 07:26, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    RB/AfC/NPP editor, frequent anti-vandalism and anti-disruptive editing efforts, would come in handy in anti-vandalism and SPI. RachelTensions (talk) 07:24, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — rsjaffe ??? 07:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I would like to request access to the temporary account IP viewer rights as I frequently deal with vandalism from IPs (such as warning and reporting them to WP:AIV where necessary), sock puppets and LTA users and want to prevent any further disruption to the project. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:11, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — rsjaffe ??? 17:16, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I am regularly working on COI, spam and anti-vandalism and it would be useful to be able to see it. I'm familiar with WP:OUTING policy and will use it responsibly. Graywalls (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done —Femke ?? (talk) 19:59, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    To handle vandalism in broadcasting and other topics that frequently attract LTAs and IP vandalism. I have created multiple SPI pages and nearly 80 reports to AIV all-time. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:02, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Giraffer (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I work at NPP, AFC, and am also active in the area of identifying spam, and COI-UPE activity. Having this permission would help to identify sockpuppets, vandals, LTAs and spammers. It may also on occasion be useful at AfD in identifying socks attempting to game the system by duplicate !voting. I am an experienced editor and would use this right conscientiously and responsibly and abide by the WP Foundation’s policies and guidelines. Netherzone (talk) 22:19, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Netherzone (talk) 22:19, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done – robertsky (talk) 22:21, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm a rollbacker and a reviewer, and a RC patroller, I use Huggle a lot, requesting this so I have it for when the time comes. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 01:49, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Forgot to mention I do agree to abide by the policy to which this permission pertains. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 01:52, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Sohom (talk) 01:57, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done — rsjaffe ??? 01:58, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hah. Giraffer (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2025 (UTC) [reply]

    I am very active in anti-vandalism, as evidenced by my extensive contributions using Huggle and Twinkle, and also often spend time identifying LTAs based on behavioural patterns. This would, therefore, be a rather useful tool for me. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll answer them promptly. Patient Zerotalk 02:09, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — rsjaffe ??? 02:18, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I'm anti-vandalism. I have read Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer and will conform to the the Foundation's guidelines. Can I apply for TAIV? I will try my best. JohnDavies9612 (talk) 04:09, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done I see no history of anti-vandalism reports. -- asilvering (talk) 04:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, I am an AfC and NPP. Gaining access to temporary account IPs would be beneficial for detecting disruptive actions, particularly after the implementation of IP masking. Best! Baqi:) (talk) 09:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Salvio giuliano 09:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    心如刀割是什么意思 什么是势能 偏左偏右是什么意思 虾肚子上的黑线是什么 hold住是什么意思
    什么克木 高高的什么 虾子不能和什么一起吃 男人结扎了有什么坏处 李白被人们称为什么
    梦见老公出轨什么意思 心肌缺血吃什么药管用 提辖相当于现在什么官 山竹什么味道 红皮鸡蛋和白皮鸡蛋有什么区别
    小脑是控制什么的 枕神经痛吃什么药 鱼露是什么味道 脸部爱出油是什么原因 花中皇后指的是什么花
    痛风挂什么科就医hcv7jop9ns2r.cn 鸟在电线上为什么不会触电hcv9jop2ns8r.cn 芭蕉花炖猪心治什么病hcv9jop5ns0r.cn 301医院院长什么级别hcv9jop6ns2r.cn 呼吸有异味是什么原因shenchushe.com
    疱疹性咽峡炎吃什么药最管用hcv9jop2ns2r.cn 精神紊乱吃什么药hcv8jop0ns3r.cn 去湿气吃什么中药jasonfriends.com cdp是什么hcv8jop8ns3r.cn 百香果什么时候种adwl56.com
    盆腔积液是什么意思hcv8jop5ns3r.cn 盐酸安罗替尼胶囊主要治疗什么hcv8jop6ns5r.cn 吵架是什么意思hcv9jop4ns3r.cn 霜和乳有什么区别hcv9jop1ns7r.cn 拔罐有什么作用hcv9jop3ns5r.cn
    脑震荡挂什么科hcv9jop0ns7r.cn 茯苓的功效与作用是什么hcv9jop2ns4r.cn 咽喉炎 吃什么hcv9jop1ns0r.cn 艾滋病检查什么项目hcv9jop5ns8r.cn 风五行属什么hcv9jop5ns3r.cn
    百度